Skip to main content

Understand. Power. Act.

The Library

New

One story, all the way down.

Supreme Court’s SAVE database ruling won’t disenfranchise voters

The Supreme Court's SAVE ruling won't disenfranchise voters. Federal law guarantees citizens a provisional ballot.

Coverage (1)· Oct 2, 3:01 PM

supreme court save ruling Justice Government

Every telling

their own versions

Washington Examiner· Oct 2, 3:01 PMSupreme Court’s SAVE database ruling won’t disenfranchise voters

The thread

supreme court save ruling →

Before

The Supreme Court revives the controversial SAVE data system : NPRThe Supreme Court is allowing use of a data system that Trump officials overhauled. The system has erroneously flagged U.S. citizens and a lower court found it violated federal privacy protections.

NPR10d agoWhole story →

Government supreme court save ruling

More like this

similar stories in the archive

Dem Claims SAVE Act Would Disenfranchise Half of PA VotersRep. Mary Gay Scanlon (D-PA) claimed that the SAVE Act would disenfranchise half of Pennsylvania voters by requiring them to show ID.

Breitbart News Network3mo agoWhole story →

Government Mary Gay Scanlon voter id law debate

Supreme Court allows Trump's voter verification databaseThe Trump administration appealed a judge's ruling that a federal database risks disenfranchising eligible voters and ignores privacy safeguards.

USA TODAY10d agoCoverage (5)Whole story →

Justice supreme court voter database ruling

Supreme Court lets Trump administration use revamped federal voter eligibility database for nowThe emergency order allows states, for now, to use the Department of Homeland Security program, called Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, or SAVE,

WTOP10d agoWhole story →

Government voter eligibility database ruling

Trump Administration Asks Supreme Court to Allow Citizenship Verification of VotersThe Justice Department on Sept. 8 filed an emergency request with the Supreme Court seeking to allow the federal government to verify the citizenship of voters using the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) immigration database [1]. The request follows a federal judge’s ruling earlier in the year that determined the administration’s use…

Natural News24d agoWhole story →

Government voter citizenship verification dispute

Wisconsin mail-in ballots to proceed as usual after Supreme Court rulingThe U.S. Supreme Court struck down President Trump’s mail-in ballot restrictions Monday. The order would have required the federal government to compile a list of eligible voters. Only those voters would have been sent an absentee mail-in ballot from USPS.

WEAU20d agoWhole story →

Government supreme court voting ruling

Senator Schmitt warns Supreme Court's birthright citizenship ruling helps ChinaSen. Eric Schmitt warns of national security threats from China after the Supreme Court birthright citizenship ruling and outlines a plan involving executive action and legislation.

Fox News3mo agoWhole story →

Security Eric Schmitt birthright citizenship ruling

Supreme Court lets Trump admin use federal database to check voter status, reversing lower courtThe Supreme Court ruled the Trump administration can use the SAVE database to check citizenship and SSNs ahead of the midterm elections.

New York Post10d agoWhole story →

Government voter roll verification ruling

Supreme Court rejects Trump mail ballot restrictions for now ahead of midtermsThe Supreme Court has rejected President Donald Trump’s bid to restrict mail ballots ahead of the midterms. The decision allows states to continue sending ballots under existing processes used by nearly one-third of voters. The Trump administration wanted restrictions in place before the November midterm elections. Election officials said there wasn’t…

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution21d agoWhole story →

Government Donald Trump midterm election rules