Skip to main content

Understand. Power. Act.

The Library

New

One story, all the way down.

Is Spending Money Protected Speech?

Plus a tangent on Citizens United.

Sources (1)· Oct 13, 7:00 AM

campaign finance debate Economy Government

Every telling

their own versions

The Dispatch· Oct 13, 7:00 AMIs Spending Money Protected Speech?

More like this

similar stories in the archive

NJ Rep. McIver's 'assault' on cops at ICE protest is protected by free speech, lawyer claimsLawyers for US Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-NJ) claimed she's protected by free speech in the criminal case alleging she assaulted cops at an anti-ICE protest -- and "she wouldn't have drawn a flagrant foul in the Knicks-Spurs game" for the move anyway.

New York Post4mo agoWhole story →

Government LaMonica McIver mciver ice protest case

TN bill would ban companies, nonprofits, unions from election spendingSen. Charlane Oliver’s bill would reverse the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision, which enabled corporations to spend unlimited money on elections.

Knoxville News-Sentinel23d agoWhole story →

Government tennessee election spending bill

Montana ballot measure could undo ruling on corporate spending in state politicsMontana voters will have a chance to speak out on the boom of corporate and anonymous money in politics that has been the result of the Citizens United court ruling.

NPR2d agoWhole story →

Citizens United foreign campaign contributions Democratic billRep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., want to establish foreign ownership thresholds for companies that spend on campaigns.

CNBC3mo agoWhole story →

Government Sheldon Whitehouse campaign finance reform bill introduced

Mike Dunleavy Explains What Warriors Would Do If Steph Demands TradeDubs GM goes off on tangent after saying Curry will finish his career with the Warriors

Sports Illustrated2mo agoWhole story →

Federal rule change threatens more than endangered speciesA rule change that would allow developers to destroy habitat that is currently protected could harm many native Louisiana animals that live near protected species.

Baton Rouge Advocate27d agoWhole story →

Planet endangered species act rule change

DOJ Argues Flock Safety Camera Data Is Not Protected by Fourth Amendment in Major Surveillance CaseThe U.S. Department of Justice told a federal appeals court that data collected by Flock Safety cameras is not protected by the Fourth Amendment, arguing that being watched on public roads is “a reality of modern life” and therefore no expectation of privacy exists there [1][2]. The argument was made by DOJ attorney Michael Weisbuch […]

Natural News6d agoWhole story →

Technology flock safety surveillance case