Skip to main content

Understand. Power. Act.

The Library

New

One story, all the way down.

Supreme Court appears open to wider video privacy law in Paramount case

Justices appeared sympathetic to a 247Sports newsletter subscriber who says Paramount shared his video history with Facebook via the Meta Pixel.

Sources (1)· Oct 18, 11:31 AM

supreme court video privacy case Technology Justice

Every telling

their own versions

TNW· Oct 18, 11:31 AMSupreme Court appears open to wider video privacy law in Paramount case

The thread

supreme court video privacy case →

Before

Justices wrestle with video privacy law from VHS eraA Supreme Court decision in the case could have far-reaching implications in the age of targeted advertising.

Roll Call5d agoWhole story →

Justice supreme court video privacy case

More like this

similar stories in the archive

Supreme Court Justices Laugh at Lawyer’s Answer in Paramount CaseThe Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday in a case that could have implications for online privacy lawsuits.

Newsweek5d agoWhole story →

The Supreme Court Is Leaning Toward a Digital Privacy VictoryThe Supreme Court appeared likely to side with a customer who invoked a semi-obscure federal law to sue Paramount for sharing his personal information with Facebook, during oral arguments on Wednesday, though multiple justices signaled that they might constrain such lawsuits in future cases. The case, Salazar v. Paramount Global, has significant…

The New Republic4d agoWhole story →

Justice supreme court vppa hearing

Justices wrestle with video privacy law from VHS eraA Supreme Court decision in the case could have far-reaching implications in the age of targeted advertising.

Roll Call5d agoWhole story →

Justice supreme court video privacy case

Court appears likely to allow internet suit based on decades-old video privacy law to go forward

SCOTUSblog5d agoWhole story →

Justice video privacy law ruling

In One Type of ‘Blockbuster’ Case, Supreme Court Weighs 1980s Video Privacy Law in Digital AgeThe Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday on how a video rentals privacy law from the 1980s applies to the digital age. Justices on both sides expressed skepticism about how the 1988 Video Privacy Protection Act, enacted in the days of VHS rentals at stores such as Blockbuster Video, applies today. The federal law, at the...

The Daily Signal5d agoWhole story →

Justice supreme court video privacy hearing

A Blockbuster-Era Law Won’t Save Your PrivacyIs Chick-fil-A a video store? Is Nordstrom the same as Blockbuster? These were two of the strange-sounding but important hypotheticals solemnly posed by justices of the Supreme Court of the United States during Wednesday’s oral argument, in Salazar v. Paramount Global, Inc., a dispute over a 1988 statute that purports to regulate what information about…

Bloomberg4d agoWhole story →

Justice salazar v paramount global oral argument

Blockbuster-Era Law Governing Privacy of Video Rentals Gets a Fresh Look From the Supreme CourtWASHINGTON (AP) — In 1988, Congress enacted a law to protect the privacy of video rentals after a journalist published details of Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork’s movie rental history during his Senate hearings. Nearly four decades later, the court is weighing how the Blockbuster-era statute fits into the modern age of digital commerce.

U.S. News & World Report5d agoWhole story →

Technology supreme court video privacy hearing

Court to hear argument on how a video privacy law applies in the internet age

SCOTUSblog7d agoWhole story →

Justice video privacy law hearing