Skip to main content
KnowGovUnderstand. Power. Act.
← Data Lab

The Library

New

One story, all the way down.

ALPR-gavel

State and federal courts have almost uniformly ruled that searches of ALPR databases do not implicate the Fourth Amendment.

Sources (1)· Oct 9, 7:50 PM

Justice
Read it

Every telling

their own versions

The thread

Privacy →

Before

DOJ Argues Flock Safety Camera Data Is Not Protected by Fourth Amendment in Major Surveillance CaseThe U.S. Department of Justice told a federal appeals court that data collected by Flock Safety cameras is not protected by the Fourth Amendment, arguing that being watched on public roads is “a reality of modern life” and therefore no expectation of privacy exists there [1][2]. The argument was made by DOJ attorney Michael Weisbuch […]
Natural News1d agoWhole story →
JusticeTechnologyflock safety surveillance case
Seattle mayor signs grocery ‘fair pricing’ into law, bans surveillanceWith a quick signature, Mayor Katie Wilson made Seattle the first city in the U.S. to ban surveillance pricing," a consumer protection and privacy measure she said would stop large grocers from using personal data to charge shoppers different prices for the same product. The new law was stiffly opposed by grocery industry representatives and went through…
Spokane Spokesman-Review1d agoWhole story →
CommerceJusticeKatie Wilsonseattle fair pricing law signing

Since

Federal judge: DOJ cannot request states' voter lists for eligibility databaseA federal judge struck down on Friday the Justice Department’s nationwide effort to collect voter registration records and identify suspected non-U.S. citizens, blocking the Trump administration from continuing the program even in states that voluntarily cooperated. U.S. District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan in Washington ruled the department exceeded its…
The Hill14h agoWhole story →
JusticeGovernmentvoter eligibility database ruling

More like this

similar stories in the archive
Federal judge rules warrantless searches using automated license plate readers as unconstitutionalA federal judge in Tulsa, Oklahoma ruled on Oct. 1 that a sheriff’s deputy violated the Fourth Amendment by searching a woman’s license plate in Flock Safety’s automated license plate reader system without a warrant, marking one of the first federal court rulings to declare such surveillance unconstitutional. The case involved Melisa Kyle, whose…
Natural News4d agoWhole story →
JusticeSecurityflock safety ruling
DOJ Argues Flock Safety Camera Data Is Not Protected by Fourth Amendment in Major Surveillance CaseThe U.S. Department of Justice told a federal appeals court that data collected by Flock Safety cameras is not protected by the Fourth Amendment, arguing that being watched on public roads is “a reality of modern life” and therefore no expectation of privacy exists there [1][2]. The argument was made by DOJ attorney Michael Weisbuch […]
Natural News1d agoWhole story →
JusticeTechnologyflock safety surveillance case
ALPR-gavel – KnowGov